Is the corrupter to blame if someone is corruptible? Who is at fault? Should the blame fall to the weak minded individual who allowed themselves to be corrupted, or to the villain who took full advantage of the situation? Is there even such a thing as a victim, or should weakness be categorized as a crime?
Of course as with all things, this can most certainly not be the truth in all situations. For to be absolute is to be extreme, to be zealous. And a zealot, weather noble or otherwise, is a force that can rarely be contained.
1 comment:
In a situation in which I am the corruptor, the corruptee is to blame. In a situation in which I am the corruptee, the corruptor is to blame. That is how the rule of thumb goes. Ask anyone......
-C-
Post a Comment